Review a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, WES’s Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. WES adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid, fair, and ensures a high quality of articles published. In so doing, WES needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts in the period of determined time by editor. Maintaining WES as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts.
REVIEWERS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
(http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/Peer%20review%20guidelines.pdf)
If WES’s Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor have invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:
WHAT SHOULD BE CHECKED WHILE REVIEWING A MANUSCRIPT?
© All rights reserved by . Designed By : Faraznet ( Online portal management and Arbitration Journal ) ver.7.1